Steve Keen: "Mythonomics”

Episode 30
August 3, 2022

(Conversation Recorded on June 22, 2022.)

On this episode, we meet with Economist, Author, and Research Fellow at the Institute for Strategy, Resilience, and Security at University College in London, Steve Keen.

Keen discusses how mainstream economics misses the centrality of energy to our economy and to our futures, the naive treatment to the risks of money and debt creation, and the disconnect economic theory has to climate change risks.

About Steve Keen:

Steve Keen is an economist, author of Debunking Economics and The New Economics: A Manifesto, a Research Fellow at the Institute for Strategy, Resilience, and Security at University College in London.

Show Notes & Links to Learn More

PDF Transcript

00:40 - Steve Info + Works

03:30 - Frank Stilwell

03:50 - Theory of the Second Best

05:17 - Paul Samuelson and paper (1966)

07:30 - Neoclassical economics

07:40 - Alfred Marshall

09:45 - Basic assumptions of economics

09:30 - Contemporary macroeconomics is applied microeconomics

11:12 - We are deeply social creatures, and this isn’t accounted for in economics

11:40 - Theory of supply (rising marginal costs)

12:15 - In reality, supply has a falling marginal cost (pg 102)

12:35 - Alan Blinder + survey on marginal falling costs (pg 22) and vs his textbook

18:30 - Energy is not included as an input (factor of production)

18:44 - Computable general equilibrium models

19:02 - Rational Expectation Revolution

19:20 - Intertemporal equilibrium models

19:21 - Cobb-Douglas Function

19:24 - Constant elasticity of production function

20:26 - When energy is included it is to a very minimized extent

20:41 - Working paper by Rudy Backmann looking at energy fall implications in Germany

21:57 - Change in energy and change in GDP is 1:1 (or .99)

22:11 - Reiner Kümmel and paper factoring energy into CD Production Function

23:10 - CO2 at 420 ppm

23:48 - Energy consumption/output in roman slaves (pg 558)

24:44 - A barrel of oil is equivalent to 5 years of human labor (Section 4.3)

25:59 - Adam Smith

26:03 - Physiocrats

26:59 - Evolution of Labor Theory of Value

28:40 - Robert Solow

29:30 - The assumption is that technology is responsible for our massive growth

30:12 - Bob Ayres

31:10 - James Watt - Steam Engine

31:00 - Energy is the true driver of growth, not technology

32:10 - Many cheap processes and productions would break down without cheap energy

32:35 - Correction - Nate states “energy contributes as little as .6 to as high as .1” - this should be “… as high as 1”.

33:01 - Second Law of Thermodynamics

35:00 - William Nordhaus and work on climate (1991)

37:43 - Larry Summers

39:44 - Steve’s paper with Matheus Grasselli and Tim Garrett

40:54 - Limits to Growth

40:55 - Graham Turner and review on Limits to Growth

41:03 - Gaya Herrington

41:48 - Tipping Points

41:59 - 2 degree celsius tipping point

42:45 - Mainstream economics model of money creation is also insufficient

46:00 - Errors in Economics mathematics

46:21 - Nate Hagens Paper

47:22 - George Soros, Institute for New Economic Thinking

48:30 - Steve’s critique of the logic Marxist Labor Theory of Value

49:03 - Minsky Software, Hyman Minsky

49:25 - Systems Dynamics

49:41 - Veil of money over barter - David Andolfatto tweet

51:05 - 2% growth is expected every year forever

51:29 - Bank of England paper on banks creating money

51:54 - Interest is not created when money is created

52:40 - Mainstream economics loanable credit model

54:10 - Positive vs negative credit and its role in the recession

54:50 - Nate’s animated movie on The Great Simplification

55:20 - Japanese market and JGB’s

55:46 - Oil depletion

55:55 - How Russia and Ukraine war affects oil supplies

56:48 - EROI

56:57 - Simon Michaux + TGS Episode

58:20 - We need a 70-80% fall in consumption to be within planetary boundaries

*Note from Steve Keen - Arguing that humans alone are consuming 175% of the renewable capacity of the biosphere, cutting that back to leave headroom rather than overshoot implies a 50% fall in consumption--which would take us to 85% (roughly) of the planet being used by humans. To leave roughly 50% of the planet to other species implies another 50% cut. So a 75% fall in human consumption would about get us there.

58:45 - France and Germany turning back to coal

58:55 - Australia reopening up coal plants

59:17 - Nate prediction that world GDP will fall 30-50% in the decade

1:02:01 - UnTax

1:07:04 - Effects of studying economics on the brain/mindset

1:07:54 - Brisbon climate dangers

1:08:34 - California drought and resulting fires

1:09:09 - We are burning through fossil energies 10 million times faster than they were created

1:09:20 - Overshoot

1:10:53 - AMOC Climate dangers

1:14:42 - Food shortage risks

1:16:53 - *James Anderson (correction from Philip Anderson) on climate

1:18:07 - Richard Tol paper

1:22:05 - Raised by Wolves

1:23:20 - Stuart Kirk Speech

Previous
Previous

Daniel Schmachtenberger: “Bend not Break #3: Sensemaking, Uncertainty, and Purpose”

Next
Next

Josh Farley: "Money, Money, Money”